States That Are Suing To Protect Net Neutrality

Demon_Skeith

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
87,009
2007
4,379
Awards
30
Credits
25,058
Steal Penalty
You're Rich Money Bags Award
Profile Music
If your state isn't red then you need to contact your congressmen, representative to support the bills in congress and your attorney general to join the multi-state lawsuit.

rutejve.jpg



The possible death of Net Neutrality is due to 150 million people deciding not to vote last year, giving us Trump as POTUS and now the issue of repealing Net Neutrality, Obamacare, a tax reform bill that is just a free giveaway to and fellation the rich and other problems from this administration.
 
Hopefully, all states decide to sue to protect Net Neutrality. It's concerning so many states don't plan on suiing the FCC over Net Neutrality.
 

Just the location this interview was held is a bit noisy.

The part of the video where the hosts were talking about "ISP charging websites money and potentially charging users money to access certain website for using a ISP internet connection" is disappointing, and can end up hurting a lot of smaller sites which don't earn any money or very little money per month from their sites. A lot of bigger sites like Netflix may end up having fewer movies, and TV shows if they spend most of their money paying for bandwidth, and can't afford to make as many shows, or pay the copyright fees to broadcast show.
 
I'm probably going to get a lot of flack for what I'm about to say, but maybe NN being dead isn't such a bad thing. I mean, I'm not happy about it, not at all. The internet has been part of my life as long as I can remember and I've been part of the internet by myself for more than 11 years. However, that's also the problem. With NN being dead and internet providers charging outrageous subscription charges, maybe people won't rely on the internet so much anymore. The internet, while theoretically connecting us together, has also driven us apart. There's a lot of people who spend time on the internet with no actual social life and maybe with NN being dead, that can change that for the better.

Of course, if this is a ploy by the government to stop people from using the internet so much, they really aren't going about it the right way at all.
 
I'm probably going to get a lot of flack for what I'm about to say, but maybe NN being dead isn't such a bad thing. I mean, I'm not happy about it, not at all. The internet has been part of my life as long as I can remember and I've been part of the internet by myself for more than 11 years. However, that's also the problem. With NN being dead and internet providers charging outrageous subscription charges, maybe people won't rely on the internet so much anymore. The internet, while theoretically connecting us together, has also driven us apart. There's a lot of people who spend time on the internet with no actual social life and maybe with NN being dead, that can change that for the better.

Of course, if this is a ploy by the government to stop people from using the internet so much, they really aren't going about it the right way at all.

I see your point and it personally falls within my own. Everyone's fears about a dead NN is just that, fears. We have no idea how things will go. Things could get better or much much worse. I don't have much to lose in this so I'm willing to stand back and see how things go.
 
I'm probably going to get a lot of flack for what I'm about to say, but maybe NN being dead isn't such a bad thing. I mean, I'm not happy about it, not at all. The internet has been part of my life as long as I can remember and I've been part of the internet by myself for more than 11 years. However, that's also the problem. With NN being dead and internet providers charging outrageous subscription charges, maybe people won't rely on the internet so much anymore. The internet, while theoretically connecting us together, has also driven us apart. There's a lot of people who spend time on the internet with no actual social life and maybe with NN being dead, that can change that for the better.

Of course, if this is a ploy by the government to stop people from using the internet so much, they really aren't going about it the right way at all.

I read Net Neutrality Ending biggest fear is the high subscription cost after NN ends.

I feel some people may end up having to be homeless or hungry if they spent most of their money on internet service.

The price of cable TV, phone service, movie tickets, video game discs, and mail may also rise since there is no cheaper online alternative if the internet service provider plans becomes insanely expensive.

Plus, some people may not afford trade school or college because of being unemployed or under-employed, and rely on the internet for learning skills like cooking, fishing, computer programming, gardening, car repair, or drawing where they can earn money from skills they learn online from online college, online video sites like YouTube, and Forums.
 
I read Net Neutrality Ending biggest fear is the high subscription cost after NN ends.

I feel some people may end up having to be homeless or hungry if they spent most of their money on internet service.

The price of cable TV, phone service, movie tickets, video game discs, and mail may also rise since there is no cheaper online alternative if the internet service provider plans becomes insanely expensive.

Plus, some people may not afford trade school or college because of being unemployed or under-employed, and rely on the internet for learning skills like cooking, fishing, computer programming, gardening, car repair, or drawing where they can earn money from skills they learn online from online college, online video sites like YouTube, and Forums.

hard to say how this will go, or if all sites would be affected (as in how would Gaming Latest fit in all this?), but this will affect all consumers.
 
hard to say how this will go, or if all sites would be affected (as in how would Gaming Latest fit in all this?), but this will affect all consumers.

I think the end of Net Neutrality could affect people who don't use the internet because a lot of retail stores now use internet websites, and services to keep track of stuff and customers. People may end up having to pay more for products like food and clothes if the store's owner pays more for internet service and bandwidth because Net Neutrality ended. Using Work and file storage website like Microsoft OneDrive, Google Drive, and Online Security Camera streaming/recording sites needs a fast lane connection, and use a lot of bandwidth if you upload and download a lot of files.

If the ISP charges $1 per MB for third-party sites after the end of Net Neutrality, some store owners may pay thousands of dollars for internet.
 
Honestly, I believe this end of net neutrality is solely to protect the interests of big corporations like Microsoft, Apple, Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc., so that any smaller competitors and start ups will suffer even harder on American soil than what they already did.
Same goes for news corps controlled by the Deep State, to prevent you from knowing the hard reality.

(Could even be that I'd be censored away after a few years, since I've already outed my criticism against any kind of authoritarism and totalitarism in premu the half of all my posts on this very forum.)
 
I agree, the government, big companies, and the deep state may try to end Net Neutrality to protect their interests by making it more expensive for the average person to access sites like Wikileaks, and also earn more money off of the people who are willing to pay for access to less mainstream websites like Wikileaks.

It can be more expensive for Wikileak donors to donate money to Wikileaks in the future if users have to pay an extra fee to use a non-mainstream payment website to donate cryptocurrency to Wikileaks.
 
Back
Top