Other Activision shareholder sues publisher over Microsoft acquisition

cm2

Well-Known Member
Full GL Member
Credits
610
Mature Board Viewing
read from gamesindustry and Polygon :
  • Lawsuit claims publisher withheld information to convince shareholders to vote in favour of $68.7bn acquisition
  • Alleges there is a conflict of interests, that directors and execs entered agreeement for "significant and immediate benefits"
  • Activision Blizzard "disagrees with the allegations" and will present arguments in court

The lawsuit, was filed by Kyle Watson in California yesterday, and describes the proposed $68.7 billion sale as "unfair for a number of reasons."

The suit centres around the preliminary proxy statement that Activision Blizzard filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Watson claims the statement was "materially deficient" and deprived him of the information needed to make an informed and rational decision, something he claims was "an effort to solicit [me] to vote [my] Activision shares in favour of the proposed transaction."

The suit also claims the Activision board "failed to create an independent committee composed of disinterested directors to run the sales process."

It accuses the board of entering into the agreement to "procure for themselves and senior management of the company significant and immediate benefits," further arguing that these benefits create a conflict of interests.

There are also references to the 'golden parachute' payouts that some directors and executives will receive.

In addition to the previously reported $14.6 million that CEO Bobby Kotick will receive, the lawsuit claims other payouts will include $25.3 million for chief financial officer Armin Zerza, $29 million for chief operating officer Daniel Alegre, $11.3 million for chief administrative officer Brian Bulatao, $14.8 million for chief legal officer Grant Dixton and $2.1 million for former chief people officer Claudine Naughton.

An Activision Blizzard spokesperson "We disagree with the allegations made in this complaint and look forward to presenting our arguments to the court."
 
It feels like someone always wants to sue someone. It will be interesting to see if there is any merit in this but I would assume that nothing comes out of it.
 
Kyle Watson must be a POS and of all places, I think California and anyone who is rich and in the area probably is too, as it shows by their laws and terrible tax rate. But how I feel about the acquisition is why not leave it be because this doesn't feel like anything to complain about and for what reason. I really don't think this guy is a gamer at all.
 
Back
Top