- Credits
- 46,851
Relive the good old days of RPGs!
I bought FF1 and 3. I refuse to give Square money for FF2 because that game is not garbage.
Rant incoming:I'll admit FF 2's first battle is bad, but what is bad about the game? (though I've only played the FF 2 advanced version.)
Nah, every version has the exact same mechanics. The remakes are just slightly less grindy compared to the NES. There aren’t really many changes from the NES version to the latter versions mechanically outside of having an auto-target feature, and removing the inventory limit. At least the items and spells actually work unlike the NES version of FF1 where half the game doesn’t work.I thought it was basic level up system, but been a long while so I could be wrong for the GBA game. Glad I never had the NES game.
Nah, every version has the exact same mechanics. The remakes are just slightly less grindy compared to the NES. There aren’t really many changes from the NES version to the latter versions mechanically outside of having an auto-target feature, and removing the inventory limit. At least the items and spells actually work unlike the NES version of FF1 where half the game doesn’t work.
The NES version never left Japan, mostly because the SNES was already out and FF4 just came out in Japan, so that’s why FF4 got renamed to FF2 on the SNES.
Pretty sure I didn't play the FF 4 as 2 when growing up, but maybe, I was like 4 years old at the time?
Final Fantasy IV - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
They skipped over 2, 3, and 5 in North America, so 4 and 6 got renamed as 2 and 3. They didn’t want to confuse us with the missing games, which totally didn’t happen when FF7 came out…
Square still published it on the old Nintendo consoles. It’s possible it was a push by Sony.I'm aware of the whole numbering fail, most likely didn't bother with renaming 7 due to change of publisher/consoles.