http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-wiiu-e3-2012
They compare the games shown at E3 to others on competing systems, and conclude while the Wii U is more powerful than consoles this gen, not significantly more so.
It's an interesting read, although I think they do make mistakes, namely assuming Wii Fit U and Nintendo Land should be showcases for the console's graphical power.
Problem is, both games are designed for the expanded audience, and the latter is designed to be a tech demo for the Wii U Game Pad, not the HD graphics. Their style is likely kept simple on purpose, like how the one in New Super Mario Bros Wii was.
What did you think of this article?
They compare the games shown at E3 to others on competing systems, and conclude while the Wii U is more powerful than consoles this gen, not significantly more so.
It's an interesting read, although I think they do make mistakes, namely assuming Wii Fit U and Nintendo Land should be showcases for the console's graphical power.
Problem is, both games are designed for the expanded audience, and the latter is designed to be a tech demo for the Wii U Game Pad, not the HD graphics. Their style is likely kept simple on purpose, like how the one in New Super Mario Bros Wii was.
What did you think of this article?