Rumor: Patent Blocks Second Hand Games

Demon_Skeith

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Credits
51,974
Steal Penalty
You're Rich Money Bags Award
Profile Music
According to NeoGAF member gofreak, the patent application was filed on 9 December 2012 by Sony Computer Entertainment Japan, and will work by linking individual game discs to a user's account without requiring a network connection meaning any future attempt to use this disc on another user's console won't work.

The patent explains that games will come with contactless tags that will be read by your console in much the same way as modern bank cards. When a disc is first used, the disc ID and player ID will be stored on the tag. Every time the disc is used in future, the tag will check if the two ID’s match up and, if not, then the disc won’t work.

The document goes on to explain that such a device is part of Sony's ongoing efforts to deter second-hand games sales, and is a far simpler solution than always-on DRM or passwords.

It's worth noting that Sony has not confirmed the existence of the device, and the patent doesn't state what machine it will be used in, with later paragraphs also mentioning accessories and peripherals.

It does raise some concerns though. Firstly, the impact on game rental stores would be catastrophic as surely this means they'd no longer be able to do business? Given publishers' usual desire to keep retailers sweet by not undercutting them on prices and the like, this would be an unusual move.

There's also the issue of what happens should your console break and need replacing, or if you have more than one console. Will the games be linked to your PSN account, meaning they can still be used, or the console, meaning an entire new library of titles would need to be purchased?

IGN reached out to Sony for comment but was told the company doesn't comment on rumour and speculation.

source

Without a doubt sony is shooting themselves in the foot on this one as next gen games (for sony and MS) won't be cheap and many people need used or rent games. Just don't do it sony.
 
More expensive? Doubt it. Games now are going on sale constantly, probably readying the PS4 and 720's $60 games. And this is bad, and MS was rumored to be doing this too, but in the end it supports developers more, and I don't mind buying new only. Just a shame this means I probably can't play PS3 games on it because I could get rid of the PS3 for the PS4. I doubt this will hurt them a lot, but if MS does it as well, it's definitely less likely do hurt them.
 
More expensive? Doubt it. Games now are going on sale constantly, probably readying the PS4 and 720's $60 games. And this is bad, and MS was rumored to be doing this too, but in the end it supports developers more, and I don't mind buying new only. Just a shame this means I probably can't play PS3 games on it because I could get rid of the PS3 for the PS4. I doubt this will hurt them a lot, but if MS does it as well, it's definitely less likely do hurt them.

What if half their fan base only used gamefly?
 
No. Bad Sony. Bad.

This is how you push people away or make them pirate. The more restrictive DRM scheme you come up with the quicker it's going to be broken, hacked or removed. We're in an age now where every time they come up with a new DRM, the only one it actually inconveniences are the legitimate paying customers. So tacking something like this on will ensure that people figure out how to counteract it fast.

And game stores would probably be closed down if this actually happened since a large chunk of their profit is from used games. Which in this sort of economy is not something we need. All that would do is make more people without work and thusly less likely to have disposable cash to purchase games... Which means less money for Sony/Publishers.

Though having this capability for Sony to block used games from being sold is something they shouldn't be allowed to do. It'd be like buying a car but being unable to sell or trade it. And if you did try to buy a used car, you'd get the physical package but have no motor or anything in it. Which would mean you'd have to go back to the manufacturer and buy an engine from them to use something you already paid for. It'd be highway robbery and is essentially a violation of our right to sell/trade property. (Because we don't actually have anything we can sell, we have a disc that is locked to our accounts alone.)

So I don't think that the patent office should ever grant one for these methods. And the Better Business Bureau (or whomever has the authority to block sales) should step in and not allow them to sell their products so long as they contain these sorts of restrictive, freedom violating, aspects.
And if somehow they did sneak one of these in, we as consumers should never buy them to send the message that this kind of crap is not tolerated.

(Which is something we should be doing already to get rid of these one time use bullshit codes for online. Most games have DLC which was to provide money for studios to pay staff and keep servers going. Not so they could turn around and charge 10$ for these online passes.)
 
I know if they go through with this the hacking community will most likely gain the highest amount of support they will ever get.

Instead of making a anti used game machine, why not just open a store that is better than gamestop? (heck giving $20 for any game while still selling it at a good used price would crush gamestop.)
 
Back
Top