THE WORLD WILL NOT END ON 21ST OF DECEMBER!!! =A

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

celo

...
Credits
1,500
U better believe. it im 85% sure that the world wont end. and if it does... u can throw a dictionary at me...
 
THIS.............
The world wouldn'tve ended in the first place even if scientists didn't announce us to be safe. They just announced us safe anyway to not make themselves look like fucking morons when the 22nd passes.
 
I'm 100% sure the world won't end. That's so ridiculous. The Y2K problem made more sense than this.

fixed

That was kind of unnecessary.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
btw guys scientists think this becuz its the shortest day.. i think. well guess what scientists?ur dumber that a dog when they sniff their bottoms.
 
btw guys scientists think this becuz its the shortest day.. i think. well guess what scientists?ur dumber that a dog when they sniff their bottoms.

What? Scientists don't think the world's going to end. And besides, the lunatics that actually DO think the world's going to end don't really base it on the winter solstice, they base it on the end of the Mayan calendar, for the most part. They're certainly dumber than a butt-sniffing dog, though, for sure. :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Like I said in another topic, we have no proof that anything will / will not happen until December 21 is over with. It may happen, but it may not happen.
 
btw guys scientists think this becuz its the shortest day.. i think. well guess what scientists?ur dumber that a dog when they sniff their bottoms.
Says the guy with bad grammar... and spelling.
 
As was said earlier, the Y2K bug was much more plausible.

Put it this way... which of these sounds the MOST plausible, out of these 3 statements?:

  1. Computers that use a 2-digit year will cease working when the year 2000 hits, as the year will be 00, thus there will be "no" year
  2. The world will end around the Winter Solstice of 2012, because the "long-count" calender will end.... (just like our calender ends every year <_<)
  3. Computers will be affected at precisely 3:14:08 UTC on Tuesday, January 19, 2038, when 32-bit Unix Time reaches the maximum, i.e. 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000, or 2147483647, after which it will wrap around to -2147483648, which is 2,147,483,648 seconds before 00:00:00 UTC on Thursday, January 1, 1970... which is 20:45:52 on Friday, December 13, 1901

A note about #3, is that for the last 5 seconds of 32-bit unix time, and the next 5 seconds after, the Unix time will be:

  • 2038-01-19 03:14:03
  • 2038-01-19 03:14:04
  • 2038-01-19 03:14:05
  • 2038-01-19 03:14:06
  • 2038-01-19 03:14:07
  • 1901-12-13 20:45:52
  • 1901-12-13 20:45:53
  • 1901-12-13 20:45:54
  • 1901-12-13 20:45:55
  • 1901-12-13 20:45:56
Just so you know, it is possible to use Unix time, to timestamp quotes... like so:

For example, let's see what happens if I choose 2147483647 (the maximum)

[quote name="NintenDan" timestamp="2147483647"]The timestamp of this quote is the LATEST date/time possible with 32-bit Unix time. 2147483647 is precisely equal to 2[sup]32[/sup] - 1, therefore, one more, is 2[sup]32[/sup][/quote]

On an unrelated note.... can you use negative values?

[quote timestamp="NintenDon timestamp="-1278572987"]OMG! I'm old.... or am I?[/quote]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top