wikileaks

Demon_Skeith

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Credits
51,755
Steal Penalty
You're Rich Money Bags Award
Profile Music
seems wikileaks is back in the headlines and is about to put the USA in a awkward spot like a girl at a slumber party that everyone there found out her secrets.

why hasn't this been shut down yet? Your thoughts?
 
I think WikiLeaks haven't been shut down because if WikiLeaks gets shut down, some people feel that "Freedom of speech" and "Freedom of the Press" have been violated. It would be like the US trying to shut down Comedy Centrol for making fun of George Bush. WikiLeaks became too big and if the US shut it down there might be a lot of resistance from the world, and the US citizens who support WikiLeaks at exposing the truth.
 
Well they need to shut down the site and the people involved - The nation's rep as a whole could be ruined. But on the negative note, if the US tried to contain the leaks, it would look as if they're hiding the "truth". Besides what the folks of Wikileaks done was unauthorized and perhaps criminal-like - breaking in and publishing thousands of documents without knowledge or consent.
 
I doubt they can if they would try, Wikileaks is located in Sweden and not the US. Thus they no power whatsoever.
 
I doubt they can if they would try, Wikileaks is located in Sweden and not the US. Thus they no power whatsoever.

oh how you are wrong, the wikileaks owner is wanted for rape (something like that) and USA is pressuring the sweden police to capture him.

But I also hear the servers for the wikileaks is hosted in a old WWII war bunker so they can't be gotten to easily.
 
WikiLeaks need to buy their own web hosting company, ISP, and DNS service since I bet they keep on being rejected from US and other countries pressuring their Webhost to not do business with them.
 
WikiLeaks need to buy their own web hosting company, ISP, and DNS service since I bet they keep on being rejected from US and other countries pressuring their Webhost to not do business with them.

I hear hackers are after them as well, they would have to buy one seriously powerful and protective IPS, DNS, ect. to keep themselves online.
 
WikiLeaks has 4Chan as protection I read on 4chan rushes to WikiLeaks' defense, forces Swiss banking site offline

The forces of Anonymous have taken aim at several companies who are refusing to do business with WikiLeaks. 4chan's hordes have launched distributed denial-of-service attacks against PayPal, Swiss bank PostFinance, and other sites that have hindered the whistleblowing site's operations.

A self-styled spokesman for the group calling himself "Coldblood" has said that any website that's "bowing down to government pressure" is a target. PayPal ceased processing donations to the site, and PostFinance froze WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's account. The attacks are being performed under the Operation: Payback banner; Operation: Payback is the name the group is using in its long-running attacks on the RIAA, MPAA, and other organizations involved with anti-piracy lawsuits.

The initial attacks against PayPal were substantially ineffective; the PayPal blog was taken offline, but the main PayPal site wasn't harmed. The attacks against PostFinance, however, have resulted in the bank's website being unavailable for more than 16 hours. It remains unavailable at the time of writing. The latest target is the site of the Swedish prosecutors in Assange's sexual misconduct trial. This too appears to be offline. Twitter has also been named as a future attack target, due to its claimed censorship of the #wikileaks hashtag.

The companies being attacked deny that their behavior is a result of government influence. Rather, they are claiming that WikiLeaks and Assange have failed to adhere to the terms of use of various services. Amazon, which for a time hosted the site, said that WikiLeaks was failing to ensure that it "wasn't putting innocent people in jeopardy." PostFinance said that Assange lied on an application form.

In a case of tit-for-tat, unknown forces have since launched a denial of service attack against Anonymous' own site (one that took it offline shortly after publication), though the IRC channel used for coordination is still operational, and its denial-of-service software, LOIC, is still functioning properly.

WikiLeaks was itself the target of massive denial of service attacks in the wake of its release of thousands of US embassy cables. The source of these attacks remains unknown. In addition to making the main WikiLeaks site hard to access, DoS attacks against DNS provider EveryDNS resulted in the company cutting WikiLeaks off, as it was unwilling to tolerate the excess traffic.

In spite of this, hundreds of mirrors of the site have popped up across the globe, with Anonymous claiming to have created many of them. An "insurance file"—an encrypted torrent of the entire cable dump—has been widely distributed, along with the promise that the decryption key will be published should anything bad happen to WikiLeaks.

Assange himself is currently remanded in custody in the UK. Swedish prosecutors are seeking to have him extradited to face sexual misconduct charges. He surrendered to police in London and was arrested. Bail was refused over fears that he might flee, and also due to some fear that he was at risk from "unstable persons." With widespread calls for his murder, this might not be too far-fetched.

It is best not to mess with 4Chan or Wikileaks since 4Chan has a lot of hackers.

I wonder if there will be any hacker war against 4Chan and the hackers who DDOS Wikleaks website.

The hosting companies which dumped Wikileaks might be in more trouble now since 4Chan been pretty successful with most of their DDOS and hacks hit big sites like YouTube, Facebook, Gawker, etc pretty hard.
 
I heard there are hundreds of duplicate wikileak websites which is an exact clone of the Wikileaks.org site, but hosted on a different domain name and hosts. The sites are called Mirror Wikileaks sites.


Assange also shared the files with 100,000 hackers.
 
Back
Top