That's my argument. If we replace the quantity of (9+3) with the variable x, we have 48/2x. This would imply that 2 and x are multiplied together. Were it otherwise, it would read 48x/2. This is a good example of crappy notation and assumptions based on the writer of the expression's intent. Order of operations falls to pieces in this situation...do you solve this by the book, or with some algebra skills? The "proper" method, I think, will be based upon who you ask.Unless you use... implied multiplication.
2/5x ... normally you'd read that as 2/(5x)... or would you read that as (2/5)x?