The Battle Between Coronavirus and Humanity

LEGEND67

Well-Known Member
Full GL Member
Credits
5,646
The coronavirus pandemic, which has cost more than 75,000 lives with more than 1.3 million cases so far, has added a new dimension of uncertainty and anxiety to our already fragile and insecure world.

While many agree that nothing will ever be the same again, it is not clear what kind of global political order will emerge in the post-corona world.

This ordeal has the potential to bring us closer to one another or turn us into further strangers in an increasingly estranged world. The choices we will make now will shape not just the geopolitical system and the economy, but also the state of our humanity in the decades to come.

The state of chaos, panic and the human cost caused by the coronavirus has exposed the weak faultlines of existing regional and international institutions. The United Nations has called it the "most challenging crisis we have faced" since World War II.

International organisations such as the UN, the European Union, the G-20 policy forum of 20 leading economies and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation have largely failed to respond to the pandemic in credible and effective ways.

They already suffer from a crisis of legitimacy, but may have a chance now to recreate themselves. COVID-19 is killing people but also destroying the trust in the current world order and its institutions.

The age-old question of balancing freedom and security remains central with new dynamics. Many are already asking to what extent we are prepared to give up our freedoms for our security.

It is likely that authoritarian political orders and petty nationalism-cum-populism will gain further currency in the post-corona world.

The rise of security-based political orders seems inevitable in the short run but does not have to decide our future. Whether it is the oppressive nature of capitalist modes of production and multinational corporations or the old-fashioned nation-state structures, we must be vigilant against abuses of power.

As an all-embracing concept, human security cannot be separated from human freedom. A healthy sociopolitical order cannot function on the basis of security alone. Freedom is a sine qua non of human creativity, thinking, relations and production.

Balancing freedom and security is also essential for an effective fight against natural and human-made disasters.

There is no doubt that biosecurity and cybersecurity together with food security will gain further urgency, but this cannot be seen only as a matter of injecting more social engineering into the global community.

The key is to provide human security for all.

Global threats show that none of us is safe until all of us are safe. There are no longer cultural hierarchies, economic immunities or economic privileges for any region, nation or country. No country can win this fight on its own. Multilateral action and solidarity may sound like a cliche, but it is more urgent than ever to save lives.

The UN must restructure itself to cope with such pandemics. Giving advice is not enough. The World Health Organization must be empowered to take preventive action. The G-20 countries must take the lead in reserving funds for vaccine development and share the results with developing countries.

Whether in Wuhan, New York, Madrid or inside the refugee camps, protecting the most vulnerable must be the priority. We must remember and cherish our deeper humanity when we care for the elderly, the sick, the needy and the foreigner.

This is what is happening in countless hospitals, clinics and intensive care units around the world, where the true heroes of this ordeal - the doctors, nurses and health workers - are risking their lives to save others.

This deeper humanity must spread to every street, every neighbourhood, every city and every country if we are to defeat the virus with our science and technology but also with wisdom, compassion and humanity.

Building higher walls may give the populists and protectionists a few scores, but cannot ensure safety and security for all. The corona days will pass but political and religious leaders must lead the way to be vigilant against the viruses of xenophobia, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and other types of racism spreading in our midst.

As we spend more time these days in our homes but also in digital spaces, this should serve as a moment of reflection for all of us. The trick, as the ancient Taoist saying goes, is to fight the monster without becoming one. Staying human in the days of coronavirus is a moral test for us all.

Every natural disaster is nature's attempt to create a new balance. It is a response to what we humans are doing to the harmony of the natural order.

This requires an urgent and appropriate response from humankind. This response cannot be just in terms of numbers, statistics and charts - i.e just more of what we have been doing for the last several centuries. A deeper understanding entails a radical reckoning and transformation of the ways in which we interact with the world.

COVID-19 is a warning that we are not the masters of the universe, and the world is not our private property.

If capitalism and consumerism continue their carnage on the world, the world will give us more viruses, pandemics and disasters.

The fight against COVID-19 must be fought by all means necessary - scientific, economic, social, security and religious. But we should not lose sight of the fact that this is not about being rich or poor, developed or developing, but about being wise, compassionate and humane.
 
Thanks for sharing the article on The Battle Between Coronavirus and Humanity

Hopefully, there will soon be a cure for the Coronavirus, and there will be fewer new Coronavirus infections and deaths.
 
Nice article, I can't help but feel the USA would have fared a lot better if Obama or anyone with a brain cell was president.

As long as it's not a Jenova brain cell.
 
Nice article, I can't help but feel the USA would have fared a lot better if Obama or anyone with a brain cell was president.

To be honest the media portrays the President much worse then he probably actually is in person. Though it really is his responsibility and his alone how he acts on TV. If he is going to fire away at Twitter constantly and make himself look like he's less qualified for the job, the media tends to jump at that and distort it which is why most Presidents have not acted that way to this date. Because of how things are seen on TV will give you a bad name. However he's not the worst President and I dislike a lot of how he handles things but it's not as if he's let anyone down either.

As for the Corona Virus, it could be a lot worse. The restrictions have been keeping most areas from turning into a new hot-spot zone so at least it hasn't escalated into something far worse. Though with the bans on businesses and stay at home orders lifting within the coming weeks I'm a bit worried. We will see how it pans out and if things get worse then they already are. Hopefully those who have the disease will recover before more people catch the virus and eventually be gone. Only time will tell.
 
Nice article, I can't help but feel the USA would have fared a lot better if Obama or anyone with a brain cell was president.
Tbh I don’t think a lot will change, as even orgs like the WHO gave out conflicting information, and the regular Joes would still be ignoring lockdown orders because shopping at Lowe’s to mulch your yard is hella important.
 
Tbh I don’t think a lot will change, as even orgs like the WHO gave out conflicting information, and the regular Joes would still be ignoring lockdown orders because shopping at Lowe’s to mulch your yard is hella important.

honestly, it kind of is, it's gardening season and people should be outside (within their own yard) doing something just so they aren't going someplace they shouldn't be like some random walmart or office supply store for no reason.
 
honestly, it kind of is, it's gardening season and people should be outside (within their own yard) doing something just so they aren't going someplace they shouldn't be like some random walmart or office supply store for no reason.
Idk, maybe they need those office supplies for working at home, or they run a home business. Making your yard look pretty is also a nicety, not a necessity, and I doubt that the Lowe’s parking lot being filled to the brim all day are people who run a gardening business.

I’ve heard that in some places, they basically banned people from going to the non-essential sections of Walmart.
 
Idk, maybe they need those office supplies for working at home, or they run a home business. Making your yard look pretty is also a nicety, not a necessity, and I doubt that the Lowe’s parking lot being filled to the brim all day are people who run a gardening business.

I’ve heard that in some places, they basically banned people from going to the non-essential sections of Walmart.

Lowe's still has other things that a person would need to upkeep their home. Unlike people going to other stores just to browse because they are bored at being at home.
 
It's going to be a long battle.

Here is a little prediction from me. Soon, everyone will get the virus. Some sooner and some later and after getting the vaccine(hopefully) from the government, only then everything will be back to normal.

I don't think there is going to be another way.
 
It's going to be a long battle.

Here is a little prediction from me. Soon, everyone will get the virus. Some sooner and some later and after getting the vaccine(hopefully) from the government, only then everything will be back to normal.

I don't think there is going to be another way.

I agree a lot of us will get the Coronavirus, or may of already got it without knowing because there is a shortage of Coronavirus tests in some countries. I heard not everyone has symptoms like a fever, so it is difficult to know if they got the virus without using a Coronavirus test.

Unfortunately, some people may die from hunger if the Coronavirus lockdown causes a food shortage and money problems because people can't legally go back to work, and they are not getting help from the government to buy food.
 
I agree a lot of us will get the Coronavirus, or may of already got it without knowing because there is a shortage of Coronavirus tests in some countries. I heard not everyone has symptoms like a fever, so it is difficult to know if they got the virus without using a Coronavirus test.

Unfortunately, some people may die from hunger if the Coronavirus lockdown causes a food shortage and money problems because people can't legally go back to work, and they are not getting help from the government to buy food.
I do agree with that
But the government should make people who can work at home, to continue that and for others it should do tests before making them return to work.... To be honest... This is not possible....
 
I do agree with that
But the government should make people who can work at home, to continue that and for others it should do tests before making them return to work.... To be honest... This is not possible....

I think it may take more months to make enough Coronavirus tests, and deliver them to workers to test all workers who can't work from home.

There are also a lot of people who want to open restaurants, barbers, schools, factories and clothing stores now, so a lot of workers maybe going to work in the next few weeks without getting tested.
 
I think it may take more months to make enough Coronavirus tests, and deliver them to workers to test all workers who can't work from home.

There are also a lot of people who want to open restaurants, barbers, schools, factories and clothing stores now, so a lot of workers maybe going to work in the next few weeks without getting tested.
I agree
At least IT folks can work from home.....and automated factories too.
 
Back
Top