Trump says U.S. to get diesel from Russia

Burnsy

Well-Known Member
Full GL Member
Credits
38,263

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said he has struck a deal to obtain diesel from Russia, a stunning reversal of years of U.S. pressure on Moscow over its war with Ukraine and an attempt to address high fuel prices ahead of the U.S. midterm elections.

The price of diesel hits a record high​

Trump said on social media on Friday that he struck the deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin in a phone call in which he was expected to discuss a suspected case of plague in Russia. Instead, Trump announced that Russia will immediately supply more than 300,000 tons of diesel, followed by an additional 500,000 tons in November and 1 million tons "immediately thereafter." Russia will deliver an additional 3 million tons "within a short period of time" after that, he wrote.

Trump's shocking announcement comes after he signed a sweeping Russia sanctions law last month that aimed at clamping down on Russia's energy revenues, among other areas, that fuel its war against Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called it, "a weak decision, unfortunately, a weak decision by strong partners," according to a statement released by the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington.

Trump's announced the deal as his envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner were meeting with Ukrainian officials to discuss a proposal to try to end the Russia-Ukraine war.

"I believe our team is simply being used as a smokescreen. And that is certainly not fair. It is certainly not how partners should treat each other," Zelenskyy said.

Energy​

A new executive order aims to bring down diesel prices. Could it work?​

World​

The G7 will release 100 million reserve barrels of diesel fuel over the next 4 months​

Trump's move casts doubt on the likelihood of the White House imposing sanctions on Russia this month, given that a bipartisan law passed by Congress directs the administration to target the top importers of Russian oil and gas.

Trump, in his announcement, did not address the sanctions or Russia's war but said, "Lower prices for Americans, especially our Great Farmers, Ranchers, and Truckers, is my Greatest Priority."

Washington and Moscow offer few details on deal​

The White House did not immediately respond to questions about who was paying for the diesel from Russia and when the fuel being supplied under the agreement would become available. It also did not clarify whether subsequent supplies of Russian diesel set to come next month would be supplied prior to Election Day on Nov. 3.

Gas prices globally have surged as the war in Iran upends the energy sector. While diesel futures prices dipped on Friday's news, the national average price per gallon of diesel in the U.S. was still $6.23, according to AAA, after hitting a record $6.52 on Sept. 22.

A statement from Putin, released by the Kremlin on Friday, said that during their call he and Trump dedicated "significant attention to the prospects of resolving the Ukrainian crisis" and also discussed "the situation around Iran and various aspects of bilateral relations."

Russia "confirmed its readiness to supply oil and oil products to the American and global markets," Putin said. "I am confident that this will have a positive impact on the entire global economy."

The two leaders agreed to continue contacts, Putin said in the statement.

Trump and Putin's deal draws immediate backlash​

Zelenskyy, in a lengthy post online reacting to the deal, said Russia would repay it "with further terror and perfidy." He cast it as an investment in the war, allowing it to be prolonged.

"It plays into Russia's hands — allowing it to kill more, wage war for longer, have even less respect for America, and inflict even greater losses and damage on the world," he said.

Rep. Don Beyer, the senior House Democrat on the Joint Economic Committee, called Trump's announcement "infuriating."

"This is what we warned anyone who would listen: Trump isn't the slightest bit trustworthy when it comes to Russia," Beyer said in a statement on X. "Giving him expanded tariff powers in hopes he would use them to help Ukraine was a mistake. Now he's lifting sanctions on Russian fossil fuels."

The law Trump signed last month envisions sanctions on Russian officials, banks and a shadow fleet of tankers and bans all new U.S. investment in Russia and the handling of sovereign debt.

It also directed Trump to impose tariffs of up to 100% on the top five importers of Russian oil or natural gas, with an exception for countries that import less than 15% of Russia's natural gas exports and have taken significant steps to reduce those imports.

The U.S. has not imported Russian oil or gas since 2022, when the Biden administration banned them because of Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Treasury Department moves to ease diesel sanctions for six months​

Shortly after Trump made the announcement, the Treasury Department said it was immediately issuing a temporary license allowing Russian diesel to be supplied to the global market.

This is the latest in several licenses the U.S. Treasury has issued regarding Russian fuel shipments since the start of the Iran war earlier this year. But it is the first such license to ease sanctions on diesel for a period lasting longer than the standard 30-day window since the start of the Ukraine war.

The new so-called general license means U.S. sanctions will not apply until April 2027 on deliveries of Russian diesel that has been loaded onto tankers as of Friday. The department extended similar easing of sanctions in March and April even though Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had ruled out such a move earlier in the year.

The extensions continue to underscore how the fallout from the Iran war has boosted Moscow's ability to profit from its energy exports, which had been restrained by the U.S. and other allies since the invasion of Ukraine.

Russia, once a major exporter of diesel, has banned exports since July as it has struggled to meet demand inside the country because of Ukraine's repeated attacks on Russian oil refineries. The International Energy Agency says Russian diesel output has fallen by about 30%.

Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak told state news agency Tass that Russia is "immediately starting to lift restrictions on diesel exports ahead of schedule." He said that Moscow could start supplies to the U.S. already in October, and that Russia's domestic market will be "fully supplied" with diesel, as well.


Read that headline as many times as it takes to sink in.
He's waging a war to open a straight that was open before the war. And he's funding his country's enemy to offset the side effects of it to try to bail his party out of a quagmire. This is the stable genius I keep hearing about.
 

List of Republicans Criticizing Trump’s Diesel Deal With Russia​


Read from newsweek:

President Donald Trump's proposal to import Russian diesel to lower costs ahead of the 2026 midterms is facing backlash from Republican lawmakers.

Trump on Friday announced that Russia would "immediately" be supplying at least 300,000 tons of diesel fuel to the American and global markets, with 500,000 tons to follow in November and 1 million tons "immediately thereafter." The agreement followed a "highly successful discussion" with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump wrote on Truth Social.

The following Republican members of Congress have spoken out against Trump's diesel fuel proposal with Russia:

  • Senator Susan Collins (Maine)
  • Senator John Curtis (Utah)
  • Senator John Kennedy (Louisiana)
  • Senator Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)
  • Senator Dan Sullivan (Alaska)
  • Senator Thom Tillis (North Carolina)
  • Representative Don Bacon (Nebraska)
  • Representative Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania)
  • Representative Michael McCaul (Texas)
  • Mike Rogers (Senate Candidate in Michigan)
  • Former Vice President Mike Pence
Collins, Curtis, Murkowski and Tillis joined a bipartisan statement with Democratic Senators Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and Ron Wyden of Oregon opposing the deal.

They wrote that Trump's decision "runs directly counter" to a ban on Russian energy imports in 2022 that was passed "to prevent American dollars from financing Putin's brutal war against Ukraine."

"The United States should not provide Putin with a financial lifeline while Russia continues to kill Ukrainian civilians," the senators wrote. "The Administration must immediately reverse course."

Murkowski separately wrote on social media, "A few weeks ago, Congress overwhelmingly passed legislation to increase sanctions and tariffs on Russia."

"We can discuss Russia's return to global energy markets once the war is over, but in the meantime, we need to cut off everything fueling it," she added.

Kennedy told The Washington Sun that he does not support the decision to import diesel from Russia, calling Putin a "butcher." Rogers also told the news outlet that he would not want to give Putin "an inch."

Nate Adams, Sullivan's spokesperson, told The New York Times that the senator believes "American energy dominance is the answer to high prices, and that means producing more of it in Alaska, for Alaskans, by Alaskans, not importing it from Russia."

Bacon criticized Trump's approach to Russia in a series of social media posts.

"Most Americans want to help the victim of Putin's invasion defend their freedom & independence. We won't stand on the side of the invader and pressure the victim to make concessions. Most reject buying fuel from Russia that funds the bombing of cities," the retiring congressman wrote on X on Monday.

Fitzpatrick said he plans to introduce legislation to block "any and all purchases of Russian oil."

McCaul, who is not running for reelection, wrote on X that he was "concerned the lifting of sanctions on Russian oil will only fund the Kremlin's war machine—emboldening more violence and destruction, as we have seen in recent days."

"Through the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act, we gave the president significant authorities and leverage against China and Russia to bring Putin's war to an end with a negotiated settlement," he wrote.

Pence wrote on X that the announcement "makes no sense and is a betrayal of the legacy and leadership of the late Senator Lindsey Graham."

Lindsey Graham, a senator from South Carolina who was one of Ukraine's staunchest supporters in Congress, died in July.

"While Ukraine fights for its survival, Putin's war machine continues to prosecute his terrorist war on civilian populations and innocent Ukrainians are dying every day," Pence wrote.
 
We were allies with them, weren't we?
I'm pretty sure Russia and Ukraine staged the war. All we had to say was Ukraine shouldn't join NATO. We didn't need a war over it. Biden didn't say anything to that effect. I don't know why we should support communist Ukraine.
 
The same Ukraine trying to join the famously anti-communist NATO? The same Ukraine that left the USSR?

Ukraine isn't communist, they're pretty capitalist if we're going by economic standards.
But Russia didn't want Ukraine to join NATO. How much political experience do you think Zelensky has that their people were okay with?
 
In a war there is almost always proxy war element to it depending on how you see it too. The are proxy elements in the Russia - Ukraine War though many of the proxy elements are byproducts of the war that Putin started. Putin's war with Ukraine is basically the same with Putin's war with Georgia back in 2008. In that war Putin used recognized/unrecognized separatist proxies (Abkhazia and South Ossetia), claiming a mandate to protect populations, and seizing territory—served as a functional blueprint for the 2014 annexation of Crimea and the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Both wars stem from Russia's broader effort to project power in the Black Sea region, suppress Western and Euro-Atlantic integration (NATO and EU), and maintain a sphere of influence over former Soviet republics. Putin occupies roughly 20% of Georgia’s internationally recognized territory (Abkhazia and South Ossetia), a tactic mirrored in Ukraine through the occupation of Crimea, Donbas, and southern regions.

Now The US proxy war thing with Russia and vice versa is always an ongoing thing, though when Trump came into power and became buddy-buddy with Putin, the proxy war ops were (and are still) significantly reduced, from Trump's side. US and Western military aid, intelligence sharing, and financial support turn Ukraine into an instrument used by Western powers to weaken Russia strategically and to keep Putin's military power/ambition in check while avoiding direct open war with Russia and thus arguably a necessary thing and morally you are in the right as by doing any of those you are helping a country that's being invaded forcefully by another country that wants to conquer it. While Ukraine did not start the war, Zelenskyy benefits from the continuing war too politically as he can maintain his political and presidential power indefinitely as long as the war continues to rage on. With Putin -- Other than his military power goals -- the continuing war provides a pretext for the Russian government to enact sweeping wartime censorship, completely dismantling the political opposition and criminalizing criticism of the state. The Military weapons industries also like it when there is a continuing war as their profits skyrocketed. The Russia-Ukraine conflict is multifaceted, involving numerous layers and proxy elements (byproduct ones or not byproduct ones or somewhere in the middle ones).

The 2008 Russia-Georgia historical war is actually in DCS too in great detail and I flew OPs in DCS 10 years ago, in a what if Scenario if US actually sent fighters there to help Georgia though historically that's not the case, US response was limited to deploying military aircraft to deliver humanitarian supplies, providing financial aid packages, and dispatching Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to help broker a diplomatic ceasefire. But in DCS it did show in great detail on what the Russians did in Georgia militarily. All of the military ops from both sides, detailed troops positioning, engagements all of it. And you could see it in detail from your fighters too, the ground war ops between the 2 exchanging fire either when flying recon ops or CAS (Close Air Support) Ops or Bombing Ops.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top