I would typically not have any opinion on such things, but now I do.
Many games from the past have failed to age well into today's society.
Take, for example, Super Smash Bros. I mean the N64 game that started a legendary fighting game series.
First, look at the character models. Compare them to today's games; how badly have they aged to you?
Also, the textures appear to be slightly odd.
Not only that, but compared to its successors, Super Smash Bros. has an extremely tiny roster of characters. Add to that a small amount of stages, and it's inferior to the Smash Bros. games of today. But back then, it was a legend.
Then there's Star Fox. The Super FX Chip in the SNES is what made it the way it was before the N64 sequel.
But the levels are bland, the frame rate is a mere slideshow, and lacks the targeting reticle that would come in oh-so handy in future games.
What are your opinions? What other games haven't aged very well at all?
Many games from the past have failed to age well into today's society.
Take, for example, Super Smash Bros. I mean the N64 game that started a legendary fighting game series.
First, look at the character models. Compare them to today's games; how badly have they aged to you?
Also, the textures appear to be slightly odd.
Not only that, but compared to its successors, Super Smash Bros. has an extremely tiny roster of characters. Add to that a small amount of stages, and it's inferior to the Smash Bros. games of today. But back then, it was a legend.
Then there's Star Fox. The Super FX Chip in the SNES is what made it the way it was before the N64 sequel.
But the levels are bland, the frame rate is a mere slideshow, and lacks the targeting reticle that would come in oh-so handy in future games.
What are your opinions? What other games haven't aged very well at all?