When the Common Age is 100

Demon_Skeith

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Credits
150,009
Steal Penalty
You're Rich Money Bags Award
Profile Music
Something I've thought about today, back in old times women were marrying and having kids in their very early teens because how long you lived was rather short. Now we have people breaching the 100 mark in age and it's becoming more common by the year and when the normal life of a human is beyond 100 years what changes do you think that will have on growing up?


Currently it's: your in school at age 6, you can start working/driving at 16, gain adult privileges at either 18 or 21 and hopefully retire in your 60s.


What do you hope or don't want to see change to any of that? Do you think living past 100 will cause problems to society who will have to adjust taking care of the very old and the still coming new age of kids.
 
Actually, I hope nothing changes. I don't want the age of adult privileges to increase. On the contrary, I think the age of marriage should be lowered, so we can enjoy a longer adult life.

People used to marry at the age of 13 back in 1800. And I don't think that people used to live shorter lives two centuries ago. Sure, there were incurable diseases (such as Tuberculosis) that killed a lot of people, but many others lived until the ages of 70 or 80.
 
Demon_Skeith said:
I think the last thing needed is lower age on marriage, young kids don't need that mess yet.
Agreed

I don't think anything should change. Although I could see the retirement age being raised, especially in countries with free health care, because old people generally require more medical care and that costs the government money. 
 
The government should find ways to increase the birth rate for people, so there would be enough adult workers  in the future to take care of the elderly, and other workers like construction workers, farmers, teachers, etc who pay taxes to pay for roads, hospitals, schools, and other tax funded programs which everyone uses.

Some old people still make money by writing, drawing, being a boss, teaching, and other less active ways of making money, so having more old people could increase the tax money being collected, so we all pay less taxes, and there are more buyers for goods like food, electronics, glasses, and services like Taxi rides.
 
Demon_Skeith said:
I think the last thing needed is lower age on marriage, young kids don't need that mess yet.
I don't remember saying that anyone would be forcing them to marry. I just think that they should be allowed to do it if they want to.

That's like saying, I don't agree with legalizing weed because I don't want my family to smoke it. If they are determined to smoke it, they will do it anyways. There are plenty of underground sources to get it. Same thing with teenagers being in relationships. Even if the law doesn't approve them, if they are to have sex, they will. Lowering the age of marriage would actually be beneficial, because it would allow teenagers (who did happen to do the deed in unfavorable circumstances and remained pregnant) to make their relationship official and raise their baby in a loving family, instead of the girl's parents having to raise the baby while the baby's father ends up in jail because the current laws believe they can dictate when people should fall in love.
 
alakazam said:
I don't remember saying that anyone would be forcing them to marry. I just think that they should be allowed to do it if they want to.

That's like saying, I don't agree with legalizing weed because I don't want my family to smoke it. If they are determined to smoke it, they will do it anyways. There are plenty of underground sources to get it. Same thing with teenagers being in relationships. Even if the law doesn't approve them, if they are to have sex, they will. Lowering the age of marriage would actually be beneficial, because it would allow teenagers (who did happen to do the deed in unfavorable circumstances and remained pregnant) to make their relationship official and raise their baby in a loving family, instead of the girl's parents having to raise the baby while the baby's father ends up in jail because the current laws believe they can dictate when people should fall in love.
heheheh loving family, yeah no. I think most young love is a train wreck these days, even those who seem to date for years, marry in their late 20s or early 30s seem to devoice soon after.

Not to mention how can you raise a family if both parents are still in high school?
 
I don't really like the school system, but I doubt it'll change. I wish other than the basics of primary and Jr high school, the rest of it was specialized that we would go because we wanted to learn that. High School years are full of heavy subjects we won't remember or use again unless we are on a  specific branch. So much unnecessary strain. 

Anyway yeah, I think 6 - 15 is a good age for studying.
16-20 for apprenticeships, specialized career studying or entry level work. Learning to drive.
18+ Adult privileges.
60 for retiring age is fine. Every few years they keep delaying it, so I disagree they should expand it more. They are contributing since they're in school to the system, it is well damn time to get in return from society and government. So yeah, let government pay for their free health medicare.

It seems I am more interested in the diverged topic than the topic at hand, my apologies. 
alakazam said:
I don't remember saying that anyone would be forcing them to marry. I just think that they should be allowed to do it if they want to.

That's like saying, I don't agree with legalizing weed because I don't want my family to smoke it. If they are determined to smoke it, they will do it anyways. There are plenty of underground sources to get it. Same thing with teenagers being in relationships. Even if the law doesn't approve them, if they are to have sex, they will. Lowering the age of marriage would actually be beneficial, because it would allow teenagers (who did happen to do the deed in unfavorable circumstances and remained pregnant) to make their relationship official and raise their baby in a loving family, instead of the girl's parents having to raise the baby while the baby's father ends up in jail because the current laws believe they can dictate when people should fall in love.
 I don't think that'd change DS comment whether you wanted to force them or not.
I think Just by the legislation making it legal would mean another load on their backs. Teeenagers being ina relationship should not lead straight into marriage. I think marriage should be the result of a planned and calm decision and not the rushed union of two teenagers that slipped in a horny moment. That their bodies are able to conceive a new life doesn't mean they are ready to take care of it. We've heard of girls getting pregnant as young as nine years old. No, there is a reason we divide childhood and adulthood with what we call the teenage years. That is the age where they are learning the ropes and when they're dealing with a lot of hormonal changes. While I am sure we can find exceptions in the rule with teenayers with wisdom behind their years, I don't think the majority would be able to deal with juggling school, career, independence, family, self-grow, entertainment.  

 My cousins and certain neighbours have been forced to take vows for girls they got pregnant or boys who impregnated them. The stress they build you can see it in their eyes. None of the people I know that has gone through this has remained with the original couple and the babies in the end still spend a lot of time with other relatives because they are studying and working or just working full time, their career taking a  back seat.

For the, what I think are, rare cases where both teens truly have found their partner for life and are willing to push through, they can always prepare without the document meanwhile, studying, working and saving, etc. And then as soona s they're lawfully able to, get the document. like you said they don't need the paper to be in a relationship, but for legal stuff they need to be old enough as not to do it because of a whim.
 
Demon_Skeith said:
assuming the world has room for you and you're still in good health.

I can try harder on the good health part, but yeah I am not sure how much room will be left on the Earth by then. Hopefully enough for everyone.  :o
 
alakazam said:
People used to marry at the age of 13 back in 1800. And I don't think that people used to live shorter lives two centuries ago. Sure, there were incurable diseases (such as Tuberculosis) that killed a lot of people, but many others lived until the ages of 70 or 80.
Actually at that time most children never made it to adulthood. You would have 15 kids and be lucky if two survived that long. Taking that into account you can see how it would dramatically lower the average lifespan once calculated for overall.
 
Back
Top