look at this-
http://www.thestar.com/living/artic...n-how-to-respectfully-refer-to-the-family-dog
I think this is a load of crap. what do you guys think about it?
http://www.thestar.com/living/artic...n-how-to-respectfully-refer-to-the-family-dog
Animal metaphors are usually put-downs, say editors Andrew Linzey and Priscilla N. Cohn. Wild and wildness are associated with an “uncivilized, unrestrained, barbarous existence,’’ they insist. And when pet is combined with owner, it recalls an era when animals were regarded as “property, machines or things to use without moral constraints.’’ That’s why the journal prefers companion animal.
I think this is a load of crap. what do you guys think about it?